Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

Constitution nil, Clegg & Coase won

I have written before about Coase’s Theorem – whenever the law creates or imposes an inefficient rule, people will bargain or contract around it – named after Nobel laureate, Ronald Coase. It seems that Coase’s theorem works just as well for our constitution.

For weeks, if not months, we have been told that, if the General Election resulted in a hung parliament, the incumbent Prime Minister had first go at forming a government. Well, it took just one sentence from Nick Clegg at 10.30 am on the morning after the night before (“I’m talking to Dave”) and Gordon Brown was left high and dry for as long as Nick Clegg wanted it that way.

Roll the clock forward 24 hours and, with the public (allegedly) clamouring for Brown to resign, the constitutionalists and commentators told us that he couldn’t do so until there was a new PM ready to take over. Technically correct. But as soon as the Labour Party saw a political advantage in Brown declaring that he would not be staying on, he announced exactly that. If Brown had wanted to make the announcement earlier, he could have done so.

Has anyone learned from this? We are now being told that this parliament will last for five years and that there will be legislation to make that into law. But if the current coalition Government were to break apart and no other grouping could command a majority, what then? If an Act of Parliament can fix the date of the next General Election, another Act can change it.

See also:  Leveson – Is the battle already lost?

Does that worry me? Coase not.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

Related articles on this website
I keep hearing that last Friday's agreement between the UK and the EU 27 means that a hard Brexit is off the table. Well, I'm looking at the table and ...
Read the complete article
A couple of matters caught my attention this morning, from the world of journalism and coffee shops. Part 1 ... Friday the fifteenth The Daily Mail wants us to believe that an ...
Read the complete article
It seems that, when it comes to Brexit, we can’t trust anyone to get their facts right. Not even lawyers. At least, not Lawyers for a People’s Vote (LfaPV). I don’t ...
Read the complete article
I think the three words at the end of the following sentence must be the most chilling – and the most heart-warming – I have ever read from an accounting ...
Read the complete article
Guidance on Reporting Actuarial Information[This page is now obsolete. I have kept it online in case anyone wishes to access the information out of historical interest.]In 2012, I developed a ...
Read the complete article
Regular readers of this blog must be sick to death by now of me repeating how much damage accounting standards are doing to pension schemes (here, here, here and, even ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
The separation of retail and investment banks is back in the news following the Chancellor’s recent Mansion House speech. Ever since the Government bail-out of Royal Bank of Scotland and ...
Read the complete article
Hard Brexit is dead. Long live … hard Brexit
Friday fiascos
Lawyers for Alternative Facts?
Accountants becoming effective?
TAS R etc
Accountants in a tangle with Webb
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision
Bankers cooking with Gas?