Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

Home from Home

I seldom write about politics and I don’t plan to start now. Not in a party-political sense, at any rate. But the arguments over MPs’ second homes annoy me. Deciding which is the “second” home shouldn’t be about where the MP spends most time. And we won’t solve the problem by building a dormitory for MPs to stay in overnight near the Houses of Parliament. The home that taxpayers should fund is the one which the MP would dispose of if they ceased to be an MP. Rarely will that home be difficult to discern.

Take the case of the former Home Secretary who has a family home outside London and, famously, a bedroom in her sister’s home in London for when she is working at Westminster. It’s pretty obvious which home she would stop using if she ceased to be an MP – regardless of how many nights per week she stayed in London when Parliament was sitting.

It is cases like that one which give rise to the MPs’ dormitory idea. But that solution also misses the point. Many MPs have their lives the other way around. Take the case of Tony Blair. His was a London-based family with a constituency in the North East. Once elected (and before he moved to Downing Street), he didn’t need access to a bed in London. He already lived there. He needed accommodation in Sedgefield when staying there on constituency business. We can debate the level of accommodation the taxpayer should stump up for, but it’s plain that, in Blair’s case, it was the constituency home which was the one that would go when he ceased to be an MP, not the London home.

See also:  Has the press done to Miller what police did to Mitchell?

Compensating MPs for their expenses shouldn’t be rocket science. There are countless precedents in every walk of business life. It just needs some rational thought starting from the premise: the expenses that should be reimbursed are the ones which would vanish if the MP lost their seat.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

Related articles on this website
A couple of matters caught my attention this morning, from the world of journalism and coffee shops. Part 1 ... Friday the fifteenth The Daily Mail wants us to believe that an ...
Read the complete article
It is not that long ago that the press were pointing to Andrew Mitchell MP and asking: “If the police can do that to a government minister, what chance the ...
Read the complete article
Lovers of Life on Mars may have thought that DCI Gene Hunt was giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee yesterday. In fact, it was a real (ex-)cop, former ...
Read the complete article
Yesterday, the Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps led the daily Downing Street press conference with news of new transport infrastructure to help us in the current crisis and beyond. But the ...
Read the complete article
WelcomeI have embraced a portfolio-style career, with regulation, dispute resolution and clarity of communication central to much of my work: click to see my [expand title=appointments.] Member of Ofcom's Academic ...
Read the complete article
I keep hearing that last Friday's agreement between the UK and the EU 27 means that a hard Brexit is off the table. Well, I'm looking at the table and ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
Guidance on Reporting Actuarial Information[This page is now obsolete. I have kept it online in case anyone wishes to access the information out of historical interest.]In 2012, I developed a ...
Read the complete article
Friday fiascos
Has the press done to Miller what police did to Mitchell?
“I’m Hayman and I’m ’aving hoops”
Is this the way to maintain public faith in the lockdown?
Home
Hard Brexit is dead. Long live … hard Brexit
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision
TAS R etc