Owen Paterson was not an innocent man, but he seems to have convinced himself that he was and – for a while, at least – he persuaded the Conservative hierarchy that his case provided ammunition to criticise the Parliamentary Standards process. The principles at issue are straightforward enough for most people to conclude that Paterson had done wrong. And yet the rules are complex enough for him to believe, fervently, that he had not and, worse, that the system had mistreated him. But it is not too difficult to pick one’s way through the conflicting arguments to see what lies within.
Most Popular on Site
- A Few Good Men – but this one?
- A Frog in My Throat?
- Harry’s Bottom and the Right to Privacy
- A horse. A zebra. Or maybe it’s a fish?
- Court takes a liberty with our freedom
- A rule that Mae be broken
- You mean we’re NOT supposed to avoid tax?
- Neil and Adel: A love that cannot speak the name
- When did you stop ****ing your wife?
- A conversation with my doctor