Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

Trump was a riot – and I mean that literally

Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial is underway. His lawyers argue that, when he told supporters to “fight like hell”, he was only speaking figuratively. His lawyers are wrong.

Their argument is effectively that Trump’s message was no different from calling for a “war on poverty” or a “battle of ideas” – metaphors that are commonly used without (usually) intending any physical violence to ensue. There is ample evidence to show that was not Trump’s intended meaning. But perhaps the simplest argument – one that should appeal to lawyers – is that, on the day the Capitol was stormed, there was no legal way to “fight” in a purely figurative sense.

There are times when a speaker wants their audience to think a particular thought without having to tell them explicitly

Whenever we fight – be it literally or figuratively – we take action: making speeches, distributing literature, raising funds. The list of potential acts is endless. But, on 6 January 2021, the day of Trump’s speech, there were no actions left for Trump’s supporters to take. The election had been fought (yes, “fought”). The court battles (yes, “battles”) had been decided. All that remained was for Congress to affirm the result … for Congress to affirm the result. There was nothing lawful the supporters in the street could do to facilitate that affirmation or to obstruct it.

Consider this analogy. Imagine that a trial is taking place in a criminal court. If you think the prosecution case is wrong, you can encourage the defendants to “fight” the charges. You call on their lawyers to “attack” the prosecution’s case. But if you make a speech to a group of people who have no role in the trial, your options are limited. If you beseech them to “march” on the court, to “fight like hell” when they get there, to “stop the [trial]”, you cannot be confident that anyone will believe you were expecting only lawful acts to ensue when the crowd reached the courthouse.   

See also:  I'm partial to a bit of Beeb

In my 2020 web-book, I Learned to Write, I included a chapter on using language figuratively. “There are times”, I wrote, “when a writer wants to influence their reader to think a particular thought without having to write it out explicitly.” Trump is a master of that – especially when appealing to his base.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

Related articles on this website
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Alison Saunders, says that juries apply a “much higher test” than prosecutors do when deciding whether to pursue a case. If that is true, ...
Read the complete article
It seems that, when it comes to Brexit, we can’t trust anyone to get their facts right. Not even lawyers. At least, not Lawyers for a People’s Vote (LfaPV). I don’t ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
On a day when I am learning it may be OK to eat red meat after all, I’m also having to re-think my attitude to the BBC. I am delighted that ...
Read the complete article
We all know that Harry Redknapp is innocent of tax evasion. A jury has decided that unanimously. But readers of The Times newspaper may have been a little surprised by the ...
Read the complete article
Much has been written about the Government’s appeal to the Supreme Court in the Brexit case. Political commentators tell us that the appeal is very likely to fail. Many lawyers ...
Read the complete article
[I wrote this piece on Election Day 2020, before the vote-counting started. Less than 24 hours later, it was looking like not a single one of my insights would be ...
Read the complete article
I keep hearing that last Friday's agreement between the UK and the EU 27 means that a hard Brexit is off the table. Well, I'm looking at the table and ...
Read the complete article
Testing times for the Director of Public Prosecutions
Lawyers for Alternative Facts?
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision
I’m partial to a bit of Beeb
Redknapp admits his guilt?
Brexit: supreme logic required
Predicting the past: Can Trump win again?
Hard Brexit is dead. Long live … hard Brexit